<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Theological Ramblings of an Anglican Ordinand &#187; methodology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ordinand.wordpress.com/category/methodology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ordinand.wordpress.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 09:39:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<cloud domain='ordinand.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://ordinand.wordpress.com/osd.xml" title="The Theological Ramblings of an Anglican Ordinand" />
		<item>
		<title>Jesus&#8217; Death and the Temple in the Gospel of Mark</title>
		<link>http://ordinand.wordpress.com/2009/11/14/jesus-death-and-the-temple-in-the-gospel-of-mark-2/</link>
		<comments>http://ordinand.wordpress.com/2009/11/14/jesus-death-and-the-temple-in-the-gospel-of-mark-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 09:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jonswales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Book Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historical Jesus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historiography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark's Gospel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N.T. Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quest for the Historical Jesus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trinity College]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eschatology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gospel of mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kingdom of God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second temple judaism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tribulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brant Pitre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rikk Watts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ordinand.wordpress.com/?p=785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Death of Jesus in the Gospel of Mark
The purpose of my last few months of research has been to explore, within the narrative of the gospel of Mark, the link between Jesus&#8217; death and the Temple.  This link is clearly to be seen at the surface level of the passion narratives where the  Temple [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=ordinand.wordpress.com&blog=2580167&post=785&subd=ordinand&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ordinand.wordpress.com/2009/11/14/jesus-death-and-the-temple-in-the-gospel-of-mark-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/5aee6dc14374f448749658b974dbfd92?s=96&#38;d=monsterid&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jonswales</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Springboard, Research and Atonement</title>
		<link>http://ordinand.wordpress.com/2009/10/03/springboard-research-and-atonement/</link>
		<comments>http://ordinand.wordpress.com/2009/10/03/springboard-research-and-atonement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 20:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jonswales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historical Jesus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark's Gospel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penal Substitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trinity College]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anglican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gospel of mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second temple judaism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ordinand.wordpress.com/?p=744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few years ago, as I was applying to do ordination training and a research degree at Trinity College,  I read Tom Wright&#8217;s response to &#8216;Pierced for our Transgressions&#8217;. In this critique, in which he described the book as sub-biblical, he lamented the fact that discussion of the atonement often bypasses the Gospels and heads [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=ordinand.wordpress.com&blog=2580167&post=744&subd=ordinand&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ordinand.wordpress.com/2009/10/03/springboard-research-and-atonement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/5aee6dc14374f448749658b974dbfd92?s=96&#38;d=monsterid&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jonswales</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://img.youtube.com/vi/IA8CY5iC_ww/2.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deep Church By Jim Belcher: Part 3</title>
		<link>http://ordinand.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/deep-church-by-jim-belcher-part-3/</link>
		<comments>http://ordinand.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/deep-church-by-jim-belcher-part-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jonswales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Calvinism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neo Calvinism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neocalvinist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postmodernity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reformational]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worldview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[belcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[c.s. lewis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dooyeweerd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[driscoll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emergent church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kuyper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[van til]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ordinand.wordpress.com/?p=742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Chapter 4 is entitled &#8216;Deep Truth&#8217; and explores issues of epistemology.  He thinks that traditionalists have often misrepresented postmodernism and have failed to understand postmodernity as  emergent leaders understand it. Is postmodernity in all forms the enemy? Lstenign to the rhetoric of some evangelicals you would think so. However, he also criticises the emergent church [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=ordinand.wordpress.com&blog=2580167&post=742&subd=ordinand&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ordinand.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/deep-church-by-jim-belcher-part-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/5aee6dc14374f448749658b974dbfd92?s=96&#38;d=monsterid&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jonswales</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://ordinand.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/deep-church-200x300.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Deep-Church-200x300</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mark 13: The Temple, tribulation and the arrival of the Eschaton Part 4</title>
		<link>http://ordinand.wordpress.com/2009/07/21/mark-13-the-temple-tribulation-and-the-arrival-of-the-eschaton-part-4/</link>
		<comments>http://ordinand.wordpress.com/2009/07/21/mark-13-the-temple-tribulation-and-the-arrival-of-the-eschaton-part-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jonswales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historical Jesus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historiography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark's Gospel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N.T. Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quest for the Historical Jesus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soteriology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kingdom of God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second temple judaism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tribulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chicken cashew nuts and fried rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comign of the son of man]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edrward adams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parousia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pitre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[son of man]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ordinand.wordpress.com/?p=637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Vindication of the Son of Man
R.T France rejects a parousia understanding of this passage as the text does not speak of the &#8217;son of man&#8217; coming to earth but on the basis of its Daniellic background is to be understood, with Mark 8:38, as &#8216;enthronement, of the the &#8216;one like the son of man&#8217; coming [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=ordinand.wordpress.com&blog=2580167&post=637&subd=ordinand&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ordinand.wordpress.com/2009/07/21/mark-13-the-temple-tribulation-and-the-arrival-of-the-eschaton-part-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/5aee6dc14374f448749658b974dbfd92?s=96&#38;d=monsterid&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jonswales</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Excuse me, Dr Clines, I disagree</title>
		<link>http://ordinand.wordpress.com/2009/05/12/excuse-me-dr-clines-i-disagree/</link>
		<comments>http://ordinand.wordpress.com/2009/05/12/excuse-me-dr-clines-i-disagree/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 09:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jonswales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postmodernity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ordinand.wordpress.com/?p=586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David J.A. Clines offers us this intersting quote,
&#8216;If there are no &#8216;right&#8217; interpretations, and no validity beyond the assent of various interest groups, biblical interpreters have to give up the goal of determinate and universally acceptable interpretations, and devote themselves to producing interpretation they can sell- in whatever mode is called for by the communities [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=ordinand.wordpress.com&blog=2580167&post=586&subd=ordinand&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ordinand.wordpress.com/2009/05/12/excuse-me-dr-clines-i-disagree/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/5aee6dc14374f448749658b974dbfd92?s=96&#38;d=monsterid&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jonswales</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tasty Worldview Quote</title>
		<link>http://ordinand.wordpress.com/2009/05/10/tasty-worldview-quote/</link>
		<comments>http://ordinand.wordpress.com/2009/05/10/tasty-worldview-quote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 18:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jonswales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Historiography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neo Calvinism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neocalvinist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reformational]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world view]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worldview]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ordinand.wordpress.com/?p=581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
 Naugle, in his significant study of the concept of worldview, describes the crucial role of stories and meta-narratives..
&#8216;These stories that establish a symbolic world do indeed guide all forms of human activity. Worldview narratives create a particular kind of &#8216;mind&#8217;, and serve in a normative fashion as &#8216;controlling stories&#8217;. The most fundamental stories associated [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=ordinand.wordpress.com&blog=2580167&post=581&subd=ordinand&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ordinand.wordpress.com/2009/05/10/tasty-worldview-quote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/5aee6dc14374f448749658b974dbfd92?s=96&#38;d=monsterid&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jonswales</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pitre and Second Temple Judaism</title>
		<link>http://ordinand.wordpress.com/2008/11/20/pitre-and-second-temple-judaism/</link>
		<comments>http://ordinand.wordpress.com/2008/11/20/pitre-and-second-temple-judaism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jonswales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historical Jesus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historiography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penal Substitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quest for the Historical Jesus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tribulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brant Pitre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Tempel Judaism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ordinand.wordpress.com/?p=467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#60;
I am currently doing a thorough study of Jesus, The Tribulation and the End of Exile (JTEE)  by Brant Pitre. Here are some reflection on his work on tribulation themes within Second Temple Judaism. Any comments?
(a) Historiography and Second Temple Judaism

Due to a lack of serious scholarship in this area Pitre is to be applauded [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=ordinand.wordpress.com&blog=2580167&post=467&subd=ordinand&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ordinand.wordpress.com/2008/11/20/pitre-and-second-temple-judaism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/5aee6dc14374f448749658b974dbfd92?s=96&#38;d=monsterid&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jonswales</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>N.T Wright: Method in Historical Jesus Research Part 2</title>
		<link>http://ordinand.wordpress.com/2008/08/29/nt-wright-method-in-historical-jesus-research-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://ordinand.wordpress.com/2008/08/29/nt-wright-method-in-historical-jesus-research-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jonswales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historical Jesus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historiography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark's Gospel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N.T. Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quest for the Historical Jesus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesus and the Victory of God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Testament and the People of God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postmodernity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Gospels]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ordinand.wordpress.com/?p=290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Historical Method: Hypothesis and Verification

Knowledge of the past is achieved through a method of hypothesis and verification. A hypothesis s: &#8216;is essentially a construct, thought up by a human mind, which offers itself as a story about a particular set of phenomena, in which the story, which is bound to be an interpretation of those [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=ordinand.wordpress.com&blog=2580167&post=290&subd=ordinand&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ordinand.wordpress.com/2008/08/29/nt-wright-method-in-historical-jesus-research-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/5aee6dc14374f448749658b974dbfd92?s=96&#38;d=monsterid&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jonswales</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>N.T Wright and Karl Barth in Conversation: Justification and Methodology</title>
		<link>http://ordinand.wordpress.com/2008/04/05/nt-wright-and-karl-barth-in-conversation-justification-and-methodology/</link>
		<comments>http://ordinand.wordpress.com/2008/04/05/nt-wright-and-karl-barth-in-conversation-justification-and-methodology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 11:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jonswales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Justification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N.T. Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soteriology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Barth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Perspective on Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Testament Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pauline Studies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ordinand.wordpress.com/?p=111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I figure that you may aswell share essays online which may be of use to other students, researchers or of general interest. The following paper was produced about 5 years ago whilst at Sheffield University. It seeks to anaylse the methodology and hermeneutics of N.T Wright and Karl Barth in the light of their views [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=ordinand.wordpress.com&blog=2580167&post=111&subd=ordinand&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ordinand.wordpress.com/2008/04/05/nt-wright-and-karl-barth-in-conversation-justification-and-methodology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/5aee6dc14374f448749658b974dbfd92?s=96&#38;d=monsterid&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jonswales</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://ordinand.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/wright.jpg?w=400" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://ordinand.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/cl94_f_only.jpg?w=400" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>